When I first added up the cost of producing a book, publishing looked like a rather expensive restaurant. One person prepared the manuscript, another served it, and someone else brought the bill. The author sat there wondering at what stage her money had disappeared.

Now we have AI. In an evening I can get a preliminary critique, check the spelling of character names, draft a blurb, and discover that a character has somehow become younger between Chapter Six and Chapter Twelve. Does that mean publishers and editors are finished? I don't think so. It does mean that some familiar prices have become harder to explain.

The book industry isn't dead

I prefer numbers to grand pronouncements. The Association of American Publishers estimated US publishing revenue at $33.4 billion in 2025, up 2.5% year over year. In its 2026 industry survey, the Book Industry Study Group and BookNet Canada reported that 63% of organizations used AI, up from 48% the previous year, based on responses from 771 professionals.

So publishers are still selling books. They're also learning new ways to work. “Editing is dead” makes a splendid headline, but the editors I know would probably disagree. What's changing fastest is the price of a preliminary technical pass.

What I wouldn't pay for blindly anymore

Spelling checks, repeated words, name consistency, the first map of a manuscript, basic structural notes, draft metadata. A writer can do much more of this herself. We have released two free open-source EditRoast skills: a whole-manuscript critique and proofreading workflow for Codex and Claude Code. The files are free to download, although the AI provider may charge for access or usage. The author still has to inspect the findings.

I would be equally careful not to decide that a book is publication-ready just because a machine has polished twenty sentences. It may have corrected away a joke I put there on purpose. Or failed to notice that the reader loses interest somewhere in the middle.

What still deserves a fee

An editor who can disagree with me intelligently. A cover positioned for the right reader. Distribution and relationships with booksellers, reviewers and media. The work of getting a real person to pay attention. Negotiating rights — especially languages and territories.

I once had a blogger write about my book and watched the sales chart remain stubbornly unchanged. I wrote about that experience. Reader attention is not something we can generate endlessly, even when the copy is perfect.

Translation and audio: cheaper production, new responsibilities

For my second book I spent days choosing how Russian idioms and jokes should sound in English. AI could offer ten options. But which one still sounded like my narrator? That is why I described good translation as almost co-authorship.

Audio is not going away either: the Audio Publishers Association reported $2.43 billion in US audiobook sales in 2025. A cheaper voice is not necessarily a voice someone wants to listen to for ten hours.

So what changes now?

Publishers will have to explain the value beyond production. Agents will need to make selection, deal-making and market knowledge more visible. Authors must learn the difference between a useful first-pass report and finished professional work. Everyone should ask what happens to a manuscript, and its rights, before handing it to any system.

I don't want to go back to the days when the first step towards a book was an enormous invoice. I don't want a world where literature is measured in tokens generated per minute either.

Producing text is getting easier. Finding the reader who says “This is about me” remains difficult.

What I'd send a literary agent · My manuscript-preparation tools